Universality
and the use of Sacred Images among the ancient Churches.
By:Matthew James Bellisario
The images displayed in all of the ancient
Catholic/Orthodox churches throughout the world attest to
an ancient Christian mindset completely lost in the
Protestant world. Sadly the same liberalism has crept
into even the Catholic Church over the last 50 years or
so. Many of today's modern Catholic churches are being
built with the same iconoclastic mindset that the Church
defeated back in the 700s. This mindset was brought back
into existence from the Protestant Reformers in the 1550s
and beyond. In this essay I will demonstrate how this
iconoclastic mindset is contrary to true Christian
worship. The false interpretation of “graven images”
fueled the Protestant rebellion against ancient Christian
Tradition, and it still carries on to this day. It is
important that we continue building our Catholic churches
consistently in accord with ancient Tradition, and
equally important for those outside the Church to embrace
the Catholic faith.
In October of 1517 Martin Luther nailed his 95 theses in
Wittenberg. He would become a catalyst for the many
heretics that followed him. Many iconoclastic uprisings
occurred in Germany after the Reformation and later
throughout Europe. John Calvin would exhibit a rabid
hatred for the Sacred Images, and in the Netherlands in
1566 Catholic churches would be “cleansed” by the so
called “Reformers” from top to bottom. We can see this
mentality carried over into all forms of Protestantism.
Calvin himself wrote “If the authority of the ancient
church moves us in any way, we will recall that for about
five hundred years, during which religion was still
flourishing, and a pure doctrine thriving, Christian
Churches were commonly empty of images. Thus, it was when
the purity of the ministry had somewhat degenerated that
they were first introduced for the adornment of
churches.(Calvin, Institutes 1.11.13).” As we will see,
John Calvin, like many of today's Protestants were
ignorant of Christian history. The first 500 years did
not consist of barren churches as Calvin falsely stated.
As we know, much of the Church went through an
iconoclastic period during the 700s in which many images
were destroyed. So we have fewer examples than we would
have had if this atrocity did not happen. Never the less,
we have ample evidence that the use of images were used
in the earliest Christian communities. It is very
apparent that John Calvin was ignorant on this subject
concerning images.
The earliest archaeological exhibits we have concerning
Christian worship demonstrate the use of Sacred Images.
From the Catacombs in the
3rd
century to
the desert town of Dura Europos, the oldest Christian
church in existence, we see images of Our Lord. The image
of Jesus Christ adorned the walls of the Dura Europa
church and date to the middle of the
3rd
century.
Unfortunately we have precious few examples of churches
this old (c. 2nd,
3rd
centuries)
because of the persecutions throughout the empire, and
the sheer vast amount of time spanning between us and
those early centuries. There are however plenty of
examples for this argument to be put to rest. Other
examples include Christ the Good Shepard mosaic from the
mausoleum of Galla Placidia, c.425-450,
the image of the "Miracle of the Loaves and the Fishes,"
from the Church of Sant'Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna. c.504.
There are hundreds of examples of bas-relief stone images
on sarcophagi dating back to the
2nd
and
3rd
centuries
with many different Gospel depictions. A trip to Rome and
some museums in Italy lay this argument to rest. There is
just too much historical evidence proving the widespread
use of images in the first 6 centuries of Christianity.
Many Protestants claim that this was a product of the
“Roman Church”, propagating pagan practices. What is
interesting is the use of images is hardly a “Roman”
idea. It is a universal Christian idea handed on to us in
our vast Tradition of giving honor and glory to Almighty
God. How vast is the use of images in Christendom before
the Reformation? It was very vast indeed! The use of
images in Christianity date back to the oldest sites
throughout the Christian world.
Starting out with the Egyptian churches and monasteries,
we can see that the remaining ancient churches in Egypt
all exhibit the widespread use of images within them. For
instance the Monastery of the Syrians in Wadi Al-Natrun
established in the 6th
century is
adorned with images of the Virgin Mary above the entrance
way, which dates to the eighth century. (Gabra, van Loon,
Ludwig 2007) St. Catherine's Monastery at the foot of Mt
Sinai was constructed in the 6th
century by
the Emperor Justinian. The monastery houses over 2000
icons some dating from the 500s. (Gabra, van Loon, Ludwig
2007) The two most famous icons made with a melted wax
composition are the images of Christ and Saint Peter
holding the keys in his right hand and the cross in the
left. They both date to sometime in the 500s. (Evans,
White 2004) Many of these images did not originate at St.
Catherine's but were brought from other places such as
Palestine. The icon of the ascension of Christ at Saint
Catherine's is one such piece that came from ancient
Palestine and dates to the 500s. The monastery of Saint
Anthony in the Red Sea area of Egypt contains fragments
of frescoes dating from the 6th
century as
well. (Gabra, van Loon, Ludwig 2007) Imagery was clearly
used in ancient Christianity throughout Palestine, Egypt
and Syria. (Moscow 2005)
As we move across to Constantinople, now modern day
Istanbul, Turkey, we see the magnificent Hagia Sophia
church built in the 500s. It is also adorned with mosaic
images throughout. Many of them have been covered since
Constantinople fell to muslim rule in the 1452. They were
preserved under the Islamic mosaics. We can see images of
Christ, John the Baptist and the Virgin Mary in mosaic
form as well as the Virgin with the Christ Child. This
imagery was carried on to Russia and the Slavic countries
when they were Christianized. The Cathedral of St. Sophia
in Kiev is adorned with mosaic images as well. The Virgin
Orans spans the apse of the Cathedral dating from the
1030s or so.
On Mount Athos Greece all of the monasteries there show
the extensive use of icons and Holy Images. The Icon
Portaitissa, or Our Lady of the Gate was carried off
during the iconoclastic controversy in the 700s and
brought to Athos. It is still housed in a chapel today.
Every monastery here, most dated from the
10th
century, is
adorned heavily with icons and images used to teach the
faith, and give glory to God and His plan of salvation
for mankind. It is interesting to note that in one of the
monasteries on Athos is housed the girdle of the Blessed
Virgin Mary, which is the only surviving relic of her
earthly life. (Speake 2002) The use of images was and is
still widely used by the Greek Christian communities.
Medhane Alem in Ethiopia also proves a universal use of
Sacred Images. The church, which is dedicated to the
Virgin Mary, is a rock hewn church dating from the
13th
century. It
is also adorned with images throughout. So far we can see
that the use of images is far from being a pagan practice
forced on all of the Christian cultures throughout the
known world by the “Roman” Church. The cultures are very
diverse, yet the imagery the same.
If we now move off to the north up to ancient Ireland we
are once again going to see the same result. Are we
beginning to see a pattern here? The pattern seems to be
quite Catholic in its disposition, not remotely
resembling any characteristic of Protestantism. The
earliest remaining site of Christianity in Ireland is the
ancient monastic site of Clonmacnoise. Unfortunately the
site was raided and pillaged many times throughout
history. But we do have beautiful artifacts that exhibit
images in the stone carved crosses that remain. One of
the High Crosses of Clonmacnoise, is called the Cross of
the Scriptures and contains beautiful imagery of Christ
and the Last Judgement. The cross dates back to the
9th
century.
Other artifacts such as croziers and missals contain
beautiful ancient Christian imagery from this area as
well.
Now we come to Italy or the greater part of the Western
Roman empire, although many areas such as Ravenna
remained rather Eastern in their practices; all of the
churches here ironically seem to follow the pattern of
every other church in all of the cultures I have listed
so far. There are hundreds of ancient churches adorned
with Sacred Images, many dating back to the early
centuries of the Church. The Catacomb images dating from
the 3rd
century, and
the churches in Ravenna dating from the
6th
century we
have already covered in an earlier article and are
excellent examples of early Christian imagery. The lower
church of San Clemente in Rome has frescoes dating back
to the 6th
century as
well. Excavations below the basilica of SS Giovanni e
Paolo also give us witness to early veneration and use of
images. These
4th
century
images depict early martyrs as well as images of Saint
John and Saint Paul. (Hager 1999)
I could go on and on with many more examples of churches
throughout Christendom, throughout the centuries
demonstrating the use of Sacred Images. This practice is
still carried on by the true churches of Jesus Christ.
Both the Catholic and Orthodox Churches use Sacred Images
in their worship forms, and carry on this precious
Tradition of the Church. The earliest historical and
archaeological evidence that we have in Christendom prove
that the use of Sacred Images is consistent with
Christian practices from the ancient Church. These images
also parallel the celebration of the Divine Liturgy
throughout the true Church as well. We will cover that in
later articles. It is plain for anyone who wants to be
intellectually honest that the Protestant church shows no
resemblance of the ancient Christian faith demonstrated
by early church architecture and the use of Sacred Images
within them.
Although many examples I have listed date from the 500s
it is apparant that they did not all just pop up across
the globe at the same time in the 500s. We can see that
there are examples dating from the 3rd, 4th and 5th
centuries as well. The reason we obviously have less
examples during the first 8 centuries as opposed to the
later periods is because of the iconoclastic controversy
which destroyed many of these images, not to mention
invasions of many areas, in which Christian churches and
images were destroyed as well. We must also understand
the historical postion that the Church was in for the
first 300 years or so where most of these churches were
underground and had to be kept secret. Obviously you not
see giant cathedrals with images in them from this
period. The house church of Dura Europo however gives us
an exellent example of a house church from the mid 3rd
century, which contain images of Christ. No serious
historian would assume this to be an isolated case. There
just are not many of these ancient sites left for us to
examine. There are two basic positions that you can take
on this issue of images. The first being that Sacred
mages are a part of Christian worship, as seen from these
examples above, or a second postion being, that all of
these ancient communities, Christendom as a whole,
worldwide (the known world at the time) went off the
rails together starting in the 3rd century and progressed
that way for another 1200 years until John Calvin, Martin
Luther and those like them showed up to straighten it all
back out. You can be the judge of which you would like to
believe.
Matthew James Bellisario 2008
Cook, Kate, trans. A History of Icon Painting. Moscow:
Grand Holding, 2002.
Evans, Helen C. Saint Catherine's Monastery Sinai, Egypt.
New Haven/London: Yale UP, 2004.
Gabra, Gawdat, Gertrude Jm Van Loon, and Darlene L.
Brooks Hedstrom. The Churches of Egypt. Ed.
Carolyn Ludwig. Cairo/New York: American University in
Cairo P, 2007.
Hager, June. Pilgrimage. London: Weidenfield &
Nicolson, 1999.
Speake, Graham. Mount Athos, Renewal in Paradise. New
Haven/London: Yale UP, 2002.
The Christ of Sinai icon from Saint Catherine's
Monastery, Egypt. Dated to the 6th century.
