PERMISSION IS GRANTED TO USE OR REPRODUCED THIS ESSAY
PROVIDED THAT PROPER CREDIT IS GIVEN AS FOLLOWS: Hratch
Tchilingirian, The Armenian Apostolic Orthodox Church
(www.sain.org)
1996. Copyright 1996.
THE ARMENIAN APOSTOLIC ORTHODOX
CHURCH
By Hratch Tchilingirian
CONTENTS
n History
n The Faith of the Armenian Church
n The Armenian Catholic Church
n The Armenian Evangelical Church
n Functional Structure of the Armenian Church
n The Hierarchical Structure of the Church
HISTORY
The Church was founded by Jesus Christ (cf. Matthew
16:18; 28:19-20).
According to tradition, two of His Apostles--St. Thaddeus
and St.
Bartholomew--preached His Gospel in Armenia as early as
the second half
of the first century. Then in 314 , St. Gregory the
Illuminator formally
established the Church in Armenia, when King Tiridates
III was baptized
and declared Christianity as the state religion. St.
Gregory (c. 240-325 AD)
was a descendant of a noble house in Parthia, who was
brought up as a
Christian in Cappadocia. He was consecrated a bishop by
Leontius, the
metropolitan of Caesarea, as the first Bishop of Armenia.
The origin of the
Armenian liturgical and sacramental tradition is ascribed
to him. He began
his missionary work in Armenia during the first decade of
the 4th century,
while a layman, and upon is consecration as Bishop he
established the
Armenian nation's Holy See in Vagharshapat (Etchmiadzin)
. He is called
Illuminator because he "enlightened the nation with the
light of the gospel"
through baptism.
The Christianization of Armenia "determined the entire
future course of
Armenian history" . The Armenian nation embraced Christ
in its own land
where God himself "descended". Etchmiadzin, literally,
means "the only
begotten descended.” According to tradition, St. Gregory
saw Christ in a
vision who indicated to him where to build His Church,
the first Armenian
Church. As the new Faith took roots in the life of the
nation, the invention of
an Armenian alphabet was necessitated. Realizing the
needs of the
Armenian faithful, in 406, St. Mesrob Mashdotz (ca.
355-439) created the
Armenian alphabet, under the auspices of Catholicos Sahag
(ca. 348-438 ) ,
in order to make the Christian faith accessible to the
people in a written
form. Greek and Syriac were the languages used in the
church services.
Soon after the invention of the alphabet, St. Mesrob
together with St. Sahag
and a group of associates--known as Holy
Translators--translated the Holy
Scriptures into Armenian, followed by the biblical,
theological and liturgical
writings of eminent church fathers. This most important
era is known as the
Golden Age of Armenian history. "The missionary and
literary labours [of
this period] shaped the destiny of the Armenian people
and Church for
succeeding generations. … [St. Mesrob and St. Sahag,
their disciples and
co-workers] spearheaded the creation of the Armenian
Christian culture
under the patronage of the King Vramshapuh (ca 389-415).
This period was
one of intense activity and rapid development for the
Church and was
decisive in its consolidation and nationalization."
One of the most significant events in Armenian
Christianity is the battle of
Avarair. Toward the middle of the fifth century, Armenia
faced growing
pressures from the Persian King Yazdegert II, who had
issued an edict bidding
the Armenians to renounce Christ and embrace
Zoroastrianism . The
Armenians remained loyal to their faith, repeatedly
refused to disavow
Christ. In 451, headed by the commander-in-chief Vartan
Mamikonian,
Armenians fought against the Persians to preserve their
faith. Yeghishe, the
historian who wrote The History of Vartan and the
Armenian War, in a
dialogue between the Persian Tenshabuh (ambassador) and
the Priest
Ghevont, expresses the profundity of this faith, "Christ,
the living and life-
giving true God, by His beneficent will became the healer
of souls and
bodies and Himself first suffered tortures and pains to
cure the entire human
race. …He granted us second birth in health without pains
and
afflications." St. Vartan fell in the battle field of
Avarair and Armenians
were physically defeated. For the next thirty years
oppression and resistance
followed, until 484 A.D., when under the leadership of
Vahan Mamikonian,
Vartan’s nephew, the Persian King Peroz reversed course
and declared full
toleration of Christian faith and the formal recognition
and establishment of
the Church, in the treaty of Nuarsak.
The following centuries were difficult periods for the
Armenian nation--
Persian rule (430-634) and later Arab domination (c.
654-851). In the 9th
century (c. 885) there was an independent kingdom of the
Bagratids in
Armenia, however it ended in 1079. In the medieval
Kingdom of Cilicia or
Lesser Armenia, there was an independent entity from the
end of the 12th
century to 1375. Persecution and martyrdom had become
common
occurrences in the life of the Armenian nation. A larger
proportion of
Armenians were massacred by the Turks in the Ottoman
Empire starting in
the late 19th century to early 20th century. Armenians
also suffered under
the Russians starting in 1893 until the early 1980s.
In assessing history and the role of the Armenian Church
in the life of the
Armenian nation, Abp. Aram Keshishian writes: "Confessing
Christ has
become the quintessence of our history. The history of
the Armenian Church
in all its manifestations and achievements, conflicts and
struggles, is in the
fullest sense of the term the history of confessing
Christ in action. …All the
spheres of our life were touched by the transforming
power of Christ. The
Armenian culture in particular with its spiritual depth
and transcendent
dynamism has provided the Church with creative insights
and new
perspectives and horizons in terms of integrating Christ
into the ethos of the
Nation."
THE FAITH OF THE ARMENIAN CHURCH
The Faith of the Armenian Church is transmitted through
the church's Holy
Tradition, i.e., the ongoing life of the church from the
time of Christ to our
times. The Bible, liturgy and worship, writings of the
church fathers, church
councils, saints, canons, religious art and
rituals--organically linked together-
-formulate the Holy Tradition of the Church.
This Faith is articulated in the Creed of the Armenian
Church, which in
turn defines the church's raison d'etre and sets the
parameters of its modus
operandi.
The Armenian Church professes her faith in the context of
her worship.
Theologically, whatever the church believes, the church
prays . Therefore,
the Armenian Church's worship and liturgy constitute a
prime source for
teaching her faith. History, i.e., Tradition, on the
other hand, defines and
formulates the "articles of faith" and transmits them
from generation to
generation.
The Armenian Church believes in One God, the Father
Almighty who is the
Creator of heaven and earth, of all things visible &
invisible. Humanity
(male and female) is created in the image and likeness of
God, and as
such is a special creature. However, because of the Fall
of man, sin
entered the world.
The Church believes in Jesus Christ, "the only begotten
Son of God…who
came down from heaven, was incarnate, was born of the
Virgin Mary, by
the Holy Spirit. He became man, was crucified for us and
suffered and was
buried. He rose again from the dead on the third day and
ascended into
heaven and sits at the right hand of the Father. He will
come again with
glory to judge the living and the dead.
The Armenian Church believes in the Holy Spirit -
uncreated and perfect,
who proceeds from the Father– and together with the
Father and the Son is
worshipped and glorified. The Holy Spirit spoke to the
prophets and
apostles and descended into the Jordan, witnessing
Christ's Baptism.
The Armenian Church is One, Holy, Apostolic, Catholic,
Church.
She believes in one Baptism with repentance for the
remission and
forgiveness of sins. On judgment day, Christ will call
all men and women
who have repented to eternal life in His Heavenly
Kingdom, which has no
end. Christ overcame the power of death with His own and
gave salvation
to all mankind.
The dogmas of the Armenian Church are based on these
"articles of faith."
The Armenian Church belongs to the Orthodox family of
churches, known as
the Oriental Orthodox, or Non-Chalcedonian, Churches,
i.e., the Armenian,
Coptic, Syrian, Ethiopian and Indian Malabar churches.
Generally, Christianity is divided mainly between Eastern
and Western
churches. The relationship between Byzantium (East) and
Rome (West)
deteriorated gradually. In the ninth century a schism
between the Byzantine
Church and the Church of Rome started to shape during the
time of Patriarch
Photius. Then in 1054, anathemas were declared by both
sides (Patriarch
Michael and Cardinal Humbert), which lasted for
centuries. By 1204, when
the Crusaders captured Constantinople, the schism had
became final. In
1965, following the Vatican II Council, the anathemas
were lifted by both
sides in a spirit of ecumenism and understanding among
the churches.
The main theological differences and disagreements
between the Eastern
(including the Armenians) and the Church of Rome
(Catholics) are in the
following issues:
Filioque: according to the teachings of the Church of
Rome, the Holy Spirit,
the Third Person of the Holy Trinity, proceeds from the
Father and the Son,
while the Orthodox teach that the Holy Spirit proceeds
from the Father only;
Papal Supremacy: the Roman Catholics consider the Pope
the “Vicar of
Christ”, while the Orthodox churches consider him only as
“first in honor”
and in pastoral diakonia.
Papal Infallibility: The Catholics follow a "monarchical”
model of
ecclesial polity, while the Orthodox follow a “conciliar”
model, i.e., church
councils determine church dogma, canons and policies.
There are also other minor differences among these two
branches of
churches, such as the rules of fasting; unleavened bread
at Eucharist (West);
manner of conferring confirmation; celibacy of clergy;
divorce (not
sanctioned in Roman Catholicism); purgatory (East doesn't
teach it); West
has "scholastic' approach, East has "mystical" approach
to theological issues.
The main difference between the Byzantine tradition, also
known as
Chalcedonian churches, and the Armenian Church, (together
with other non-
Chalcedonian churches) has been on the issue of
Christology, i.e., the dogma
related to Christ’s Divine and Human natures.
Abp. A. Keshishian writes, "the Christology of the
Armenian Church is
fundamentally in line with the Alexandrian Theological
School. In fact, the
Cyrillian formula of 'One Nature of the Incarnate Word'
consititutes the
foundation stone of her Christology. [It should be noted
that] first, 'One
Nature' is never interpreted in the Armenian Christology
as a numerical one,
but always a united one. This point is of crucial
importance [for the
Armenian Church] particularly in its anti-Eutychian and
anti-Chalcedonian
aspects. Second the term 'nature' (ousia, in Armeian
bnut'iun) is used in
Armenian theological literature in three different
senses: (a) as essence, an
abstract notion, (b) as substance, a concrete reality,
(c) as person. In the
context of anti-Chalcedonian Christology 'one nature' is
used in a sense of
'one person' composed of two natures."
The Christological controversy continued for centuries,
often becoming a
matter of political influence and expediency. However, in
1990, the
theologians and official representatives of both Eastern
and Oriental
Orthodox Churches--after years of dialogue and
consultations--agreed in a
formal statement that their theological understanding,
especially their
Christology, is "orthodox." The statement called for
unity and communion
among the Eastern and Oriental Churches and as such, the
document was
sent to the respective leaders of the participating
churches for formal
approval.
While the overwhelming majority of Armenians are members
of the
Armenian Church (also known as the “Mother Church”), a
number of
Armenians belong to the Armenian Catholic and Protestant
(Evangelical)
churches.
The Armenian Catholic Church
Beginning in the 12th century, Armenians came into
contact with the Roman
Church through their ties with the Crusaders in Cilicia.
Later in the 14th
century, through the missionary activities of the
Franciscan and Dominican
orders, a "latinizing movement" gained ground among
"liberal elements in
the Armenian Church." However, it was only in the 19th
century, during the
Ottoman period, that the Armenian Catholics became a
millet--an
autonomous Church affiliated with Roman Catholicism. In
1831, when a
new constitution for Christians living in the Ottoman
Empire was instituted, "
'the (Armenian) Catholic Church Community" was created
and legally
recognized to form the Armenian Rite Catholic segment of
the Roman
Church, with its own hierarchy and its own
Catholicos-Patriarch." In the
early 18th century, two Mekhitarist monastic
congregations were established
in Venice and Vienna, which have "rendered inestimable
service to
Armenian letters and scholarship fostering and enriching
the religious and
cultural heritage of Armenians."
The Evangelical Armenians
The Armenian Evangelical community was formally
recognized in 1846 by
the Ottoman government, after "paiful clashes" between
church authorities
and the "reformers"-- those within the Mother Church who
wished to
“reestablished” the church’s true evangelical mission.
The beginning of
Armenian Protestantism is traced back to the 19th century
missionary
activities of the American Board of Missions, which
expanded an aggressive
mission throughout Asia Minor. As a result of the
continued affiliation of
the Armenian Evangelicals with American missionary
organizations, many
schools and colleges were established during the second
half of the 19th
century, which benefited thousands Armenians living in
the Ottoman
Empire.
THE FUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE ARMENIAN CHURCH
The functional structure of the Armenian Church is
primarily based on the
canons and established traditions of the Armenian Church
which were
formulated over the centuries. One of the most important
aspects of the
Armenian Church administration is its Conciliar System;
i.e., the
administrative, as well as doctrinal, liturgical, and
canonical norms are set
and approved by a council--collective and participatory
decision making
process. The Council of Bishops (or the Synod) is the
highest religious
authority in the Church.
The “norms” of the administrative structure of the church
go back to the
Apostolic times. A point could be made by the fact that
there was a quasi-
organizational structure in Christ’s group of twelve
apostles. Perhaps not as
clearly defined, but nevertheless, it was an
organizational subsystem that
was endowed with a specific task and purpose. While the
Scriptures do not
record the organizational aspect of the “apostolic
college,” their activities
and interaction underline the existence of certain
“norms.” For example, the
group of the twelve had a treasurer (Judas Iscariot) and
a “natural” division
of labor based on the talents or the personality of each
apostles. Matthew
was a tax collector (a “government employee”) and had
certain familiarity
with management practices of the time. In fact, Matthew
was “sitting in his
office,” when Christ met him and asked him to “follow”
him (Matthew 9:9).
Then we read that “Jesus called his twelve disciples
together and gave them
authority...” (Matthew 10:1) to carry out their mission.
We also find certain
“rules” for carrying out Jesus’s instructions: “The
twelve men were sent
out...with instructions,” (Matthew 10:5ff). One could
even see traces of
“bureaucracy” (as defined by Max Weber) as early as
Christ’s time – i.e., a)
recruitment and hierarchy, b) division of labor, c) set
of rules.
After Jesus had “left” the twelve, the mission had to
continue by the
apostles. The first thing that the apostles did was to
elect a replacement for
Judas. “...A few days later there was a meeting of the
believers...so they
proposed two men…then they drew lots to choose between
the two men,
and the one chosen was Matthias, who was added to the
group of eleven
apostles (Acts 1;15ff). Interestingly, this “democratic”
election and the
proposal process, is indicative of yet anther
bureaucratic norm, namely
“promotion based on merit and qualification.” Eventually,
as the church
progressed from being a persecuted entity of believers to
an institutionalized
organization, the rules and admonitions of "the apostles
and the elders" (Acts
15:6) were integrated in the canon books of Christian
churches, including the
Armenian Church. A significant aspect in Acts 15 is the
"conciliarity" of the
decision making process.
THE HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE OF THE ARMENIAN
CHURCH CONSISTS OF THE FOLLOWING:
- Clerical Hierarchy
Catholicos
Bishop
Priest
- Lay Representation
National Ecclesiastical Assembly
Diocesan Assembly
Parish Assembly
The Catholicos
First on the hierarchical ladder is the Catholicos, as
the Chief Bishop and
Supreme head of the Armenian Church. The Catholicos is
elected by a
National Ecclesiastical Assembly (NEA), consisting of lay
and clergy
representatives of the Armenian Churches from around the
world. Working
closely with the Catholicos is the Supreme Ecclesiastical
Council, (the
administrative arm of the NEA) which carries out the
overall administration
of the Armenian Church throughout the world.
The Bishop
Second on the hierarchical ladder is the bishop, who is
“elected” by the
people and consecrated by the Catholicos with the aid of
two other bishops
(according to current practice, the Catholiocs has
exclusive right to
consacrate bishops). A bishop in a given diocese is the
“chief executive
officer” of the region, who works in cooperation with a
Diocesan Council
(consisting of clergy and lay members), who in turn are
elected by the
Diocesan Assembly of the region. The Bishop is the
ex-officio president of
each and every Diocesan organization.
The Priest
Third on the hierarchical ladder is the priest, who is
appointed by the Bishop
and accepted by the Parish Assembly of a given parish.
The parish priest is
the ex-officio president of each and every Parish
organization. (In the case of
"monastic priests," as it is the case in Etchmiadzin,
Antelias, Jerusalem and
Constaninople, they are under the jurisdiction of the
Catholicos or the
Patriarch of the given See).
The National Ecclesiastical Assembly
The National Ecclesiastical Assembly (NEA) consists of
lay and clergy
delegates elected by the diocesan Assemblies of the
dioceses of the
Armenian Church around the world. Every bishop in the
Armenian Church
is automatically a member of the Assembly. The
Catholicos–or in his
absence the Locum Tenens–is ex-officio president of the
NEA. The primary
function of the NEA is to elect a successor to a deceased
Catholicos. The
last NEA was convened in April 1995, when it elected His
Holiness Karekin
I as Catholicos of All Armenians in Etchmiadzin.
The Diocesan Assembly
The Diocesan Assembly consists of lay delegates elected
by the Parish
Assemblies. Every diocesan clergy is automatically a
member of the
Assembly. The Diocesan Primate is ex-officio president of
the Diocesan
Assembly.
The Parish Assembly
The Parish Assembly consists of all baptized and/or dues
paying members of
a given parish in a given diocese. The Pastor is the
ex-officio president of the
Parish Assembly.
On each level on the hierarchical structure of the
Armenian Church, clergy
and lay cooperation is central to the overall
administration and ministry of
the church. While the Church is governed according to the
standards set
forth in the Canons, there are complementary By-Laws in
most dioceses that
further define the role and relationship of each
functionary in the church
within a given region.
There are four hierarchical Sees in the Armenian Church:
The Catholicosate of All Armenians in Etchmiadzin
(established by St.
Gregory the Illuminator in the fourth century).
The Catholicosate of the Great House of Cilicia
(established in Antelias,
Lebanon in 1930. Its roots go back to the 13th century).
The Patriarchate of Jersualem (the St. James Brotherhood
established the
Patriarchate at the beginning of the 14th century).
The Patriarchate of Constantinople (established in 1461
by Sultan Mehmet
II).
Each See has its own brotherhood, ecclesiastical
jurisdiction and internal
administrative by-laws. They are not separate churches,
but are part of the
One, Holy, Apostolic Church--the Armenian Church--and are
one in dogma,
theology, liturgy and in their service to the Armenian
nation.
. Church, Yegheghetzi in Armenian (from Greek Ekklesia)
literally means assembly, gathering–
coming together for a common purpose, i.e., to worship
God and hear His words. Cf. Nor Baragirk
Haygazian Lezvi, Vol. 1, Yerevan 1979, p. 651; also Abp.
Khoren Narbey, A Catechism of Christian
Instruction According to the Doctrine of the Armenian
Church, (New York: Diocese of the
Armenian Church, 1964), p 75.
. Although 301 has been traditionally accepted to be the
date of conversion, recent critical
studies by notable scholars (H. Manandian, G. Garitte and
B. Ananian) have shown that 314 is
the actual date; cf. Tiran Abp. Nersoyan, Summary Topics
of Armenian Church History (New
Rochelle: St. Nersess Armenian Seminary, 1986), p. 3.
. See Agathangelos, History of Armenians, [in Armenian]
(Tblisi, 1914), p. 782.
. According to archaeological findings, the present
Cathedral of Etchmiadzin is where St. Gregory
built an edifice over a pagan sanctuary. Before that, St.
Gregory founded a Christian sanctuary
at Ashtishat in Taron.
. Malachia Ormanian, The Church of Armenia, (London,
1910) p. 10.
. David Marshal Lang, The Armenians, (London: Unwin
Paperbacks, 1988), p. 47.
. St. Mesrob Mashdotz (ca 355-439) was born in the
village of Hatzegyats in Daron, Armenia.
After formal education in Armenia, he studied in Antioch,
where he learned Greek, Syriac and
Persian. Upon his return, he worked as a secretary in the
Royal Court. In 394, he left the palace
and became a monk and was eventually ordained a priest.
St. Mesrob is also credited for
assisting in the formulation of the Georgian and Albanian
alphabets.
. St. Sahag (ca 348-438) was born in Caesarea. He was the
only son of Catholicos Nersess the
Great, whom he succeeded in 386. He was educated in
Caesarea and Byzantium. Besides his
important role in the invention of the Armenian alphabet,
St. Sahag is also famous for organizing
the Church and establishing learning centers, where the
development of a rich Tradition became
possible.
. op. cit., Nersoyan, p. 8.
. Zorastrianism was the dominant religion of Persia,
especially during the Sassania dynasty
(211-640 A.D). It is a system of religious doctrine
ascribed to Zoroaster. He taught that the world
was made by one "Wise Lord" with the help of his Spirit
and six other divine spirits or attributes of
god. These spirits work against the Evil spirit, who is
also helped by six other spirits and tempts
man to wrong.
. Yeshisheh, History of Vartan and the Armenian War,
Trans. Dikran Boyajian, (New York: The
Delphic Press, 1952), p. 110.
. Aram Keshishian, The Witness of the Armenian Church in
a Diaspora Situation (New York:
Prelacy of the Armenian Apostolic Church, 1978), p. 53
. The Creed of the Church is the formal declaration of
her faith and belief – as expressed in the
Constantinopolitan formulary. The dogmas and teachings of
the Armenian Church are based on
the declarations of the first three Ecumenical Councils
of the Church – Nicea, in 325 A.D.,
defined the divinity of the Son of God; Constantinople,
in 381, defined the divinity of the Holy
Spirit; Ephesus, in 431, defined Christ as the Incarnate
Word of God and Mary was declared
Theotokos (Astoua‘a‘in). Subsequent "Ecumenical"
Councils, which are accepted by the
Byzantine and Roman churches, defined other theological
issues – Chalcedon 451,
Constantinople II 555, Constantinople III 680, Nicea II
787 – however, they are not formally
recognized by the Armenian Church. Nevertheless, the
decision of Council of Nicea II (787) to
uphold the veneration of the holy icons is in conformity
with the Armenian tradition already
articulated by Catholicos Vrtanes Kertogh in the seventh
century.
. Lex orandi est Lex credendi et agendi, (Latin) "the
rule of prayer is the rule of belief and of
action." This simple rule is the essence of liturgical
theology. According to the patristic
understanding, "the man of prayer is the true theologian;
the true theologian is the man of prayer."
. The word Ish and Ishah in Hebrew are the masculine and
feminine of the same word human.
An exhaustive discussion of this topic is found in Claus
Westermann, Genesis 1-11: A
Commentary, (Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House,
1987), pp. 201-208. S. Verhovskoy
writes, "The profound thought of Genesis lies in the
indissolubility of man and woman…in the very
moment of creation. God created not one man but two, in
combination and mutual dependence."
For a theological discussion of this topic see Serge
Verhovskoy, "Creation of man and the
Establishment of the Family in the Light of the Book of
Genesis," St. Valdimir's Theological
Quarterly 8:1/64, pp. 5-30.
. Theologically, in the image of God means sharing the
spiritual attributes of divinity. Likeness is
the potential of humans to become Godlike, through His
grace. From a theological point of view,
human development and growth is a continuous process in
life.
. Sin in the original Greek (hamarthia) means "missing
the mark," failure to be what one should
be and to do what one should do.
. ONE--the Church is one because Christ founded one
church. There can only be one Church
and not many, as such the Church is indivisible.
HOLY--the holiness of the Church comes from
God. "The members of the Church are holy to the extent
that they live in communion with God….
Within the earthly Church, people participate in God’s
holiness. Sin and error separate them from
this divine holiness as it does from the divine unity.
Thus the earthly members and institutions of
the Church cannot be identified as such with the Church
as holy." CATHOLIC--the catholicity of
the Church is understood in terms of the Church’s
universality throughout time and space. Also,
the term catholic should not be confused with the Roman
Catholic Church. APOSTOLIC--the
term apostolic, traditionally, affirms the establishment
of the Armenian Church by Sts. Thaddeus
and Bartholomew. However, the fact that the word
apostolic describes that which has a mission,
that which has “been sent” to accomplish a task should
not be overlooked. "As Christ was sent
from God, so Christ Himself chose and sent His apostles."
He said, "as the Father has sent me,
even so I send you… receive ye the Holy Spirit.” Just as
the apostles were sent by Christ to
preach the word of God, the Church, i.e., its earthly
members, is also sent by God to bear witness
to His Kingdom, to keep His word and to do His will and
His works in this world. cf. Thomas
Hopko, Doctrine (New York: OCA, 1981), pp. 123-128.
The major sacraments of the Armenian Church are: Baptism,
Confirmation, Penance, Holy
Communion, Matrimony, Holy Orders, Unction with Oil.
Sacrament (Khorhoort) means mystery,
i.e., something that cannot be explained in "human
terms." St. Paul uses the word mystery to
explain God's desire to save, renew and unite all things
in Christ. Jesus is mystically present in all
the sacraments of the church and is Himself the officiant
through the person of the priest. The
sacraments are outward signs that give grace and
blessings to the person receiving the
sacrament. For a more detailed discussion of sacraments
in the Armenian Church, see Garabed
Kochakian, The Sacraments: The Symbols of our Faith, (New
York: Diocese of the Armenian
Church, DRE, 1983); Bp. S. Kaloustian, Saints and
Sacraments, (New York: Diocese of the
Armenian Church, ACYOA, 1964), pp. 37-58. Also op. cit.
Ormanian, The Church of Armenia, pp.
114-117. For a historical survey and study of the
Armenian Church's sacraments, see F. C.
Conybeare, Rituale Armenorum, (Oxford: Clarendon Press,
1905).
op. cit., Keshishian, pp. 58-59n.
For the text of the Joint Statement see Window Quarterly,
Vol. II, No. 3, 1992, pp. 21-24.
op. cit., Nersoyan, p. 25-26.
For an extensive discussion of Evangelical Armenians, see
Leon Arpee, A Century of Armenian
Protestantism (New York: The Armenian Missionary
Association, 1946).
. Most other traditional churches are also governed by
the same principles, e.g., the Eastern
Orthodox Churches).
. For further discussion of this issue, see Hratch
Tchilingirian, The Administrative Structure of the
Armenian Church (Thesis at California State University,
Northridge, 1991), pp. 9-11. For a
historical survey of the Armenian Church's canonical
tradition, see Tiran Nersoyan, "A Brief
Outline of the Armenian Liber Canonum and its Status in
Modern Times." Kanon (Jahrbuch der
geselischaft für das Recht der Ostkirchen), Vienna 1973,
pp. 76-86.